PopCult: The Obsessive Journal of Quality Pop Culture
'Pickle and Peanut,' image courtesy Disney XD.

Q&A: Lo-fi animator Joel Trussell on breaking the weirdness barrier at Disney XD

Love it or hate it, the animated series Pickle and Peanut accomplished something no one in the industry thought possible: bringing the bizarre to Disney XD. The cable channel’s programming is mostly aimed at young boys, with a slate of shows that presumes they only want to watch a vast array of Marvel superheroes, Star Wars characters, Pokémon, and, um, Ducktales. Of course, that all makes good economic sense—and to their credit, the channel’s executives do occasionally reach for more, as in the mystery adventure of Gravity Falls or the silly fun of Star Vs. the Forces of Evil.

But Pickle and Peanut—whose main characters are exactly that—is a universe of weirdness onto itself. And it’s not even cute. How did it ever get on Disney?

Around 2009, Yo Gabba Gabba! cartoonist/music-video director Joel Trussell decided to stop working out of the bedroom of his suburban Knoxville, Tenn. house and join the animation industry at its crossroads: Hollywood, Calif. He and his family picked up stakes and moved to the San Fernando Valley, armed with what he thought was a short-term contract to work on a project for HBO. But that project blew up, along with the job. So he went back to freelancing—making low-budget music videos and “terrible commercial campaigns.” He also hooked up with animation studio Six Point Harness, which led to his biggest gig yet: working with Tom Hanks in 2012 to produce Electric City, an animated post-apocalyptic science-fiction miniseries that debuted on Yahoo. That in turn led to consulting gigs with Walt Disney Animation Studios, and finally to something he never thought he’d be interested in: a full-time job. Along with Fish Hooks producer Noah Jones, Trussell co-helmed Pickle and Peanut, producing 84 episodes between Sept. 7, 2015 and Jan. 20, 2018 and selling cool merch in Japan.

Originally published Sept. 2015.

When you moved to Los Angeles, you originally did not have the goal of working for a big studio—yet you ended up working for the biggest one. How did that happen?

I had been doing freelance for Disney all along—character design, development, just little stuff. And then they had been talking to me, Mike Moon was at Disney at the time, he would bring me in and introduce me to people. They had this project come in called Pickle and Peanut, and they introduced me to this guy Noah Jones, who I knew had worked on Fish Hooks. I wasn’t really interested. “Eh, whatever.” But I met the guy and we hit it off, and it seemed like a fun little project. They brought me on as a consulting director; he already had the idea of, “I want to do a lo-fi show about two bonehead teenagers.” I thought that sounded interesting, and I for sure would love to come on and see what I could do to mess it up, just to have some fun, because I’m not part of the Disney machine—I don’t care about making this thing look anything like a Disney thing. I’d rather just have some fun, really, and make something on Disney’s dime. And at the end of the day if it’s not a good fit for Disney, then I at least did a thing where I can show my sensibilities off.

I was game for that, and then it kind of slowly happened–as that progressed, they put a ring on it and they were like, ‘How about we make you an overall deal?’ Which is still a temporary thing. And I was like, “What’s this overall deal thing like? I’ve never even heard of ‘em!” So they bring me in and give me an office and everything, and they have me still kind of consulting/directing on this project, but then I’m also consulting/directing on another project. So I’m just touching a few different things, and then as that blossomed, but then this Pickle & Peanut thing picked up traction, which was surprising to everybody. Everybody who was watching us do this was like, “This is off-brand. This is funny, but we’re pretty sure that this is fundamentally not good for Disney.” We’re like, good, good! That’s what I want to see!

I wanted to do a thing that made people kind of raise an eyebrow. But it was real strange because at the time this Disney XD channel was sort of like a weirdo island, an experimental ground—we weren’t sure if it was going to last as a channel. So we were like, that’s perfect, that’s exactly where we want to be. But while we were there, it started honing itself, building itself up. Things got more and more serious as we went along, and before you know it, we’re not only making a pilot, but we were green-lit for a series. So now I’m in, now I’m taking the full ride. I’ve got the golden handcuffs on now—I’ll take ’em, because it’s been a lot more fun than I would’ve imagined. When people are responding to the stuff that you do, it’s like, ‘Oh, okay, this ain’t so bad.’ I’m sure if I started working on a thing that people are like, “Hmmm, I don’t know. This isn’t really what we’re looking for,” then my attitude would change. But at the moment, they’ve been very tolerant of me, so it’s been great.

Pickle and Peanut was a quite different show for Disney—why do you think it was open to shifting its tone and style?

I think there are a lot of ingredients to that. First of all, when I went over there, I remember XD trying to do some real boy-centric, aggressive, kick-butt action kind of stuff. They had Tron at one point, which is amazing to look at, super high-end quality—but almost too serious for kids to latch onto. It was a lot to digest. So I don’t think the viewership was real high on that stuff, and they were trying that out for a while, and they were like, well, we spent a lot of money and did not get a lot of eyeballs—this is just my perception, not necessarily hard fact. Just observing from the inside, I think they were like, “Maybe what we ought to do instead is just go for comedy.” It just so happened to be while I was there that that window of opportunity started to crack open.

Why did you go with a very un-slick look for Pickle and Peanut?

I love high-quality stuff, too, don’t get me wrong, but the way that I work is, I’m intrigued if you make something decidedly lo-fi, I like to see that work. I love even the Blair Witch Project. That thing was made on a dime, but it works because it’s supposed to look like it’s homemade. And it went over major. I’ve had to work that way on music videos a lot because they would always be no budget at all. So if it looks like I went out of my way to make it that way, then it’s like, that’s all right. As long as it doesn’t look like a mistake, then I think it’s acceptable, and maybe even enhanced because of that. For instance, one of our big inspirations for this piece was Beavis & Butt-head—not a beautiful show, right? But it’s funny because it feels like the voice of the characters comes through in the artwork—it looks like Beavis and Butt-head had a hand in making Beavis & Butt-head. So we wanted to bring that kind of aesthetic to our project because our characters also don’t have many resources, they don’t have a ton of talent, but they’ve got a lot of heart and they’re going to give it a go. And I used to make home movies like that, too. You have a video camera laying around the house, and me and a friend would want to recreate all the scenes of Coming to America, just me and him, shot for shot. So we didn’t have a whole lot of resources, but if we’ve got to have a dead body for this scene, we’d just stuff a pair of jeans and a T-shirt and throw it off a bridge or something. So we’re trying to have that hand-crafted, homemade type of feel in the show, and I think it pays off because you do get laughs out of that.

And you never got any of those infamous studio-executive comments, like “These characters aren’t cute enough! How can we sell toys with this?”

You know what? We didn’t! It was real weird, and I do think it had to do with timing because it was not a super-difficult process. They just kind of let us fool around and do our thing, and everybody was laughing. Whether it was for Disney or not, we were entertaining—all the executives were laughing. I think they would shoot each other glances, like, “Oooh, I don’t know.” A lot of wincing, a lot of cringing going on, but they were entertained. But it is Disney, so the one big commandment is story. We couldn’t be just completely random. And we’re better off for it. Every story we tell has to have the elements of good storytelling—there’s an emotional driver, and you’ve got your three-act structure. They are definitely demanding as far as that goes, and it’s been a good thing because we wanted all of our humor based off of an authentic, teenage-boy relationship. The way that they feel about each other, and the way they support each other, we wanted that to feel real, and as long as that emotion was there, we could build all this other crazy stuff on top. Whereas I feel if go to the Internet, it can be entertaining but you’re not getting that same kind of investment into the characters that we’re hoping we’re building into this series.

Pickle has a rather noticeable butt crack. Do you know whether this was the first Disney series to break that butt-crack barrier?

Boy, oh boy. I don’t track many Disney shows, and I don’t know if Phineas and Ferb has already broken that ground, but don’t think so. We might be. Now, the thing about his butt crack—we only bust that out here and there. Sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn’t. If a scene necessitates a butt crack, we’ll put it in there—but we’re not crazy.

Pickle lends his new pimple friend Greg to frenemy Lazer in hopes of landing an invitation to his cool party. Image courtesy Disney XD.

Coury Turczyn

Coury Turczyn is a concerned consumer of popular culture. Got an interesting story idea or an amazing financial opportunity to share? Contact him at coury@popcultmag.com.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of